<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kathleen Eisenhardt on Theory-Building from Case Studies 107.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://synthesistblog.com/kathleen-eisenhardt-on-theory-building-from-case-studies-107-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://synthesistblog.com/kathleen-eisenhardt-on-theory-building-from-case-studies-107-0/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: m beduya</title>
		<link>http://synthesistblog.com/kathleen-eisenhardt-on-theory-building-from-case-studies-107-0/#comment-3992</link>
		<dc:creator>m beduya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 09:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synthesistblog.com/?p=2104#comment-3992</guid>
		<description>Hi Patrick, In the Eisenhadt approach, you start with a rich hypothesis before you conduct the case studies.  The rich hypothesis are your expectations manly based from the initiql survey of literature. 
In the grounded theory building approach, it is possible for findings of initial case studies to not correspond with the rich hypothesis.  I think this is what she means by theory challenging the findings, i.e it is also correct to challenge the survey design base on the first findings of the survey.  By definition, a case study finding is not necessarily generalizable being inductive and not statistically designed.  She recommends a second round of case studies to refine the findings.  Theoretically, being unfalsifiable [er Popper, even the second round of case studies is not generalizable; it only brings you closer to the truth but that view of the truth is based on the assumptions only.  This is why, Elinor Ostrom cautions users of her studies to not consider her findings as metaphor for policy.  At the end of the day, your research will have advanced world knowledge with rich theory but with a lot of assumptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick, In the Eisenhadt approach, you start with a rich hypothesis before you conduct the case studies.  The rich hypothesis are your expectations manly based from the initiql survey of literature.<br />
In the grounded theory building approach, it is possible for findings of initial case studies to not correspond with the rich hypothesis.  I think this is what she means by theory challenging the findings, i.e it is also correct to challenge the survey design base on the first findings of the survey.  By definition, a case study finding is not necessarily generalizable being inductive and not statistically designed.  She recommends a second round of case studies to refine the findings.  Theoretically, being unfalsifiable [er Popper, even the second round of case studies is not generalizable; it only brings you closer to the truth but that view of the truth is based on the assumptions only.  This is why, Elinor Ostrom cautions users of her studies to not consider her findings as metaphor for policy.  At the end of the day, your research will have advanced world knowledge with rich theory but with a lot of assumptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick caoile</title>
		<link>http://synthesistblog.com/kathleen-eisenhardt-on-theory-building-from-case-studies-107-0/#comment-3991</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick caoile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 03:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synthesistblog.com/?p=2104#comment-3991</guid>
		<description>i am doing my dissertation at the college of education of de la salle university manila for a phd degree. my disseration is about multisectoral collaboration and i chose the public high school system in mandaluyong city as the source of my data. there are only six public. the framework is eisenhardt becasue for me it is a workable framework. i am aa bit confuse with the interphase between literature and data generated. what does it really mean to challenge findings with existing literature. for me it is more the other way aroudn, meaning i am challenging literature with my findings. and it is not jsut a matter of semantics or interchanging the words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am doing my dissertation at the college of education of de la salle university manila for a phd degree. my disseration is about multisectoral collaboration and i chose the public high school system in mandaluyong city as the source of my data. there are only six public. the framework is eisenhardt becasue for me it is a workable framework. i am aa bit confuse with the interphase between literature and data generated. what does it really mean to challenge findings with existing literature. for me it is more the other way aroudn, meaning i am challenging literature with my findings. and it is not jsut a matter of semantics or interchanging the words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SYNTHESiST Working on an Appreciative Theory of Development &#124; Synthesist</title>
		<link>http://synthesistblog.com/kathleen-eisenhardt-on-theory-building-from-case-studies-107-0/#comment-3734</link>
		<dc:creator>SYNTHESiST Working on an Appreciative Theory of Development &#124; Synthesist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synthesistblog.com/?p=2104#comment-3734</guid>
		<description>[...] It can represent an appreciative theory as per Richard Nelson (or rich hypothesis per Kathleen Eisenhardt) for formalized study going [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It can represent an appreciative theory as per Richard Nelson (or rich hypothesis per Kathleen Eisenhardt) for formalized study going [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shado Starts a Blog as I Pose Polls for Richer Conversations &#124; Synthesist</title>
		<link>http://synthesistblog.com/kathleen-eisenhardt-on-theory-building-from-case-studies-107-0/#comment-3653</link>
		<dc:creator>Shado Starts a Blog as I Pose Polls for Richer Conversations &#124; Synthesist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 08:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synthesistblog.com/?p=2104#comment-3653</guid>
		<description>[...] a synthesis and can represent an appreciative theory as per Richard Nelson (or rich hypothesis per Kathleen Eisenhardt) for formalized [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a synthesis and can represent an appreciative theory as per Richard Nelson (or rich hypothesis per Kathleen Eisenhardt) for formalized [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GLOBELICS for Inclusive Development and Innovation for the Poor &#124; Synthesist</title>
		<link>http://synthesistblog.com/kathleen-eisenhardt-on-theory-building-from-case-studies-107-0/#comment-2930</link>
		<dc:creator>GLOBELICS for Inclusive Development and Innovation for the Poor &#124; Synthesist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synthesistblog.com/?p=2104#comment-2930</guid>
		<description>[...] cclick for bigger image.Inductive Approach to Grounded Theory. As noted in our SYNTHESiST post on Kathleen Eisenhardt for inductive theory-building from cases, the joint team has also attempted to put together a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cclick for bigger image.Inductive Approach to Grounded Theory. As noted in our SYNTHESiST post on Kathleen Eisenhardt for inductive theory-building from cases, the joint team has also attempted to put together a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8th GLOBELICS - Making Innovation Work for Society &#124; Synthesist</title>
		<link>http://synthesistblog.com/kathleen-eisenhardt-on-theory-building-from-case-studies-107-0/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>8th GLOBELICS - Making Innovation Work for Society &#124; Synthesist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synthesistblog.com/?p=2104#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>[...] page on Change Management using Karl Popper&#8217;s Logic of Scientific Discovery and the post on Kathleen Eisenhardt as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] page on Change Management using Karl Popper&#8217;s Logic of Scientific Discovery and the post on Kathleen Eisenhardt as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Productivity Can Power Poor Countries to Developed Status &#124; Synthesist</title>
		<link>http://synthesistblog.com/kathleen-eisenhardt-on-theory-building-from-case-studies-107-0/#comment-2833</link>
		<dc:creator>Productivity Can Power Poor Countries to Developed Status &#124; Synthesist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synthesistblog.com/?p=2104#comment-2833</guid>
		<description>[...] as Kathleen Eisenhardt says about grounded theory, case studies can allow for a &#8220;rich empirical base&#8221; for grounded theory though purists [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Kathleen Eisenhardt says about grounded theory, case studies can allow for a &#8220;rich empirical base&#8221; for grounded theory though purists [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning Innovation Systems from Small Developed Nations &#124; Synthesist</title>
		<link>http://synthesistblog.com/kathleen-eisenhardt-on-theory-building-from-case-studies-107-0/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Learning Innovation Systems from Small Developed Nations &#124; Synthesist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synthesistblog.com/?p=2104#comment-575</guid>
		<description>[...] Hypothesis for Grounded Theory. In keeping with Kathleen Eisenhardt, the three cases above can be mined and developed further for a theory of innovation for emerging [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hypothesis for Grounded Theory. In keeping with Kathleen Eisenhardt, the three cases above can be mined and developed further for a theory of innovation for emerging [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Zanjera Community Resource Management Model 141.0 &#124; Synthesist</title>
		<link>http://synthesistblog.com/kathleen-eisenhardt-on-theory-building-from-case-studies-107-0/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>The Zanjera Community Resource Management Model 141.0 &#124; Synthesist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synthesistblog.com/?p=2104#comment-221</guid>
		<description>[...] of the clinical cases with others in Europe and Japan to develop grounded theory, in the mode of Eisenhardt (1989) that is a popular post in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the clinical cases with others in Europe and Japan to develop grounded theory, in the mode of Eisenhardt (1989) that is a popular post in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: synthesistblog.com @ 2012-05-22 21:45:36 -->
